I wasn’t sure if I wanted to talk about this, but blogging is as much about your audience as yourself, and I think this is something you all would like to hear about.

The day I pissed off 4chan appears to be the thing I am currently most infamous for on the Internet. I had forgotten about the whole experience until I read an article on Geekosystem that alluded to my mistake. So here’s the whole story!

When I started my internship at Kotaku, my boyfriend John was especially worried about me. He made me change all my passwords online and make sure my domain information was secure. He was concerned that as an intern on one of the big geek sites, I’d be a public figure and therefore a target. I took his advice, but I didn’t believe him. I was going to be an intern, not an editor. I’ve lived my online life conservatively enough that strangers haven’t cared about this smalltime journalism graduate student in D.C.

However, I made a pretty bad decision. I wrote about something that mattered a lot to 4chan, especially /v/: the nicknames of the new starter Pokémon. When I was interning at Kotaku, I rarely got to write my own stories — that’s just not what interns do, anywhere really — so I did my best to pitch original story ideas. My Nobuo Uematsu scoop was an example of this; none of the editors had met him so it made sense for me to write that story. And when I heard my friends on twitter talking about their invented nicknames for the new starting Pokémon for Black and White — news to the editors — I was allowed to write that story, too.

On Kotaku, it’s policy to ask permission before reposting stories, but not images. When reposting images, Kotaku instead takes care to link back to the image producer so they can share in the traffic. So when writing the Smugleaf story, I reposted photos from Deviant Art authors with credit… except for one photo. I couldn’t find the artist, so I posted it creditless with a note to please help me find the artist. That artist turned out to be a 4chan poster. And it turned out the meme itself originated on 4chan. As one Kotaku commenter warned me, “/v/ is pissed.”

The ire of 4chan was suddenly upon me, complete with ad hominem attacks on the article and here, my personal site. Overnight, the top Google search for my website was “Lauren Orsini nude.” (Some 4chan posters had the idea to find naked photos of me and get me “fired” from Kotaku. Luckily, those don’t exist!) I followed the advice I’d heard about getting 4chan to move on, mainly not “feeding the trolls” or responding to any of it. Arguably, writing an article on the subject isn’t doing that at all, but I think it’s been long enough.

The hubbub died down in a few days. I was expecting my editors to yell at me for it, but on the flip side, they were psyched! Since my article was 1) original and 2) controversial, it got 70K hits in just a few days, making them a lot of money. They told me not to worry about what people said. I knew this already; in today’s online age, journalists become part of each story they write. I like to think that it’s helping me develop an even thicker skin.

In summary, I’ve learned that any subject can be controversial. I thought that since I don’t write about politics, I don’t touch on anything abrasive, but now I know better. We geeks are extremely passionate about our hobbies. Bobby Kotick at Activision realized this too late — treating video game fans flippantly earned the otherwise mild mannered man the title of the most hated person in the video game industry.

Also, I need to be careful about the word “meme.” People don’t like to hear that something is or isn’t a meme. They just like things to be left alone where they can grow on their own. (That’s just one buzzword I’ve gotten in trouble for using in my time at Kotaku — my most recent article involves the term “reverse sexism” which I never considered to be a point of debate before!)

Anonymity online has become the best and worst thing about the internet. People can say things without being persecuted for their beliefs, but on the other hand, they can also reveal the cruelest intentions of their humanity since they never have to stand behind their comments. 4chan is an incredible site, spotlighting and forwarding Internet trends faster than anyone else. I wouldn’t have even had a story without 4chan! However, it can also be a spiteful community, suspicious of anyone who purports to post their content elsewhere. I view the boards with awe and not a little trepidation.

I’m not going to ignore a topic from now on just because I think it’s controversial, but I’m certainly going to pick my battles wisely. As for another article about fan art and memes, it’s just not worth it.

15 Comments.

  • Very interesting–had no idea you went through this!

    Internet anonymity is sort of a strange creature. You’re right that it makes people feel like they can say anything (and often it’s ugly stuff). But the strange thing is that they aren’t really anonymous. I mean, when anyone posts on a site like Kotaku, the site administrators have so much information about that commenter! Their IP address and so forth. You’d like a community of geeks like 4chan would be aware of that, too. Maybe they are and they just don’t care.

    Your bosses’ reaction doesn’t surprise me. It’s why I think it’s so silly when the video gaming community gets up in arms whenever some guy writes a column bashing gamers–all that traffic is just creating an incentive for more people to write columns like that!

    • Adam: Kotaku’s commenting policy probably has plenty to do with why you’ve never heard about this. Kotaku maintains the right to ban whomever they want from the comments, so many of the more… abrasive comments are no longer there. However, there’s still plenty of colorful attacks to check out! Plus, the thread on /v/ dedicated to me has been deleted by 4chan mods since it was an outright flame thread.

      Even though Kotaku and 4chan deleted plenty, I kept quiet about this for over a month since I wanted to wait until I was off 4chan’s radar. I’m sure they’ve moved on to new targets by now. And when I saw the Geekosystem article discussing the lasting impression of my mistake, I just HAD to bring it up again.

      Mary: Now that you mention it, I liked Bryan Lee O’Malley YEARS before he got famous with Scott Pilgrim, and now I’m all grumbly like, why didn’t you guys listen to me about how great he was BEFORE? This “I liked it before it was cool” hipster demeanor makes me the perfect audience for the new film though =P

  • *you’d think a community of geeks, not you’d “like” (strange typo, second time I’ve inserted the word “like” into a sentence erroneously today. Facebook must be attempting to gain control over my brain)

  • Hah. Wow, I didn’t know about this, either. I think you handled it well, but I’ve certainly learned from your experience. I think part if the ferocity coming from 4chan and other communities is that they feel there’s something essential about their community that is violated or contaminated when exposed to the mainstream. Have you experienced anything like that, where something seems really cool until the rest of the world agrees? Then suddenly “they” (everyone else) have ruined it?

  • Your boyfriend definitely made the right call initially, he’s obviously quite aware of what internet commenters are willing and capable of doing when provoked either unintentionally or intentionally.

    Also, you made the right decision in dealing with 4chan which is definitely a good lesson for others if they mistakenly get on the bad side of Anonymous.

  • Eesh, that doesn’t sound fun. I don’t read Kotaku (sorry!) nor follow 4chan, so this is the first I’ve heard about the whole thing. Talk about thin-skinned, to do all that just for not asking for usage permission. Glad you don’t seem the worse for wear.

    Your resolution is unfortunate, though, since I love meme coverage. Back to ED, I guess…

    • C.L.: It’s true, my boyfriend is way better informed– he spends quite a bit more time on forums than I do. But looking back, it’s a basic lesson in how to get anybody to ignore if necessary.

      Spencer: I am actually a huge fan of ED. I’m just lucky I don’t have my own page on it!

  • This is an interesting read, and offers a bit of an insight into how Kotaku works as well.

    • GameJournos: Thanks. Just checked out your blog. I’m impressed — the role of a journalist is to be a watchdog, but who watches the watchdog? In game journalism, I guess that’s you.

      One thing: you write about how game journalism SHOULDN’T be done, but I’d love to hear how you think it SHOULD be written.

  • Oh, I’m working on that. Huge article. It’ll be a blow-out. Or a blow-up. Is Semtex an acceptable medium for editorials?

  • Not that your not entitled to your opinion GameJournos but not including half of Laurens Post in order to make sure the take away from Laurens post was ‘That she learned to post incendiary things for massive profit’ instead of “I’m not going to ignore a topic from now on just because I think it’s controversial, but I’m certainly going to pick my battles wisely. As for another article about fan art and memes, it’s just not worth it.” which isn’t quite the same thing seems like poor journalism to me.

  • […] games, non-linear does not equal interactive’, and while you’re there, check her story about ‘the day I pissed off 4chan’ which is a timely cautionary tale for anyone on the internet, but writers and bloggers in […]

  • […] The day I pissed off 4-chan – This is another of my most highly viewed articles. I think people love this one because […]

  • We are watching you, and always will.

  • […] years ago, I wrote about Pokémon fan art for Kotaku and it went really badly and I got roasted on 4chan, back when 4chan was the worst part of the Internet, not Twitter. Sometimes I mention this to […]